| |
| |
|
| |
Kucinich jeers: Congress
is ‘complicit’ in violating Americans’ constitutional
rights
Stephen C. Webster
Raw Story
Friday, February 26th, 2010
In the wake of congressional Democrats’ reauthorization and
extension of the USA Patriot Act, few elected Democrats have been
as vocal about the post-9/11 security measures as they were during
the Bush administration.
Leave it to stalwart House progressive Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH)
to raise a rallying cry against what he called America’s love
of its fears.
|
“This legislation extends three problematic
provisions of the PATRIOT Act and, at the same time, leaves some
of the most egregious provisions in place, absent any meaningful
reform and debate,” he declared in a media advisory.
The specific provisions he cited are the Patriot Act’s powers
to conduct roving wiretaps, conduct surveillance of people not thought
to have any association with terrorism and tap into your personal
records, such as library accounts.
The extensions were approved by Congress and sent to President
Obama on Thursday, several days before the Patriot Act’s most
nefarious portions were set to expire. President Obama had yet to
sign the bill at time of this writing.
The Associated Press called the votes a “political victory
for Republicans.”
Some Senate Democrats did attempt to propose some modifications
to the legislation that would have allowed for greater oversight,
but they were ignored. Democratic leadership bowed to the wishes
of Republicans and conducted a voice vote on Wednesday, upon which
the one-year extension was passed. The House voted 315-97 in favor
on Thursday.
“Thrown away were restrictions and greater scrutiny on the
government’s authority to spy on Americans and seize their
records,” AP added. READ
FULL STORY
|
|
Share
This Article With A Friend
Click on the icon below to email this article to a friend,
or share it on the social network of your choice.
|
|
|
|
A
turning point in Europe
26 February 2010
wsws.org
Wednesday’s general strike in Greece, involving two million
workers in the public and private sectors, marks a turning point
in the political situation throughout Europe. It represents the
most significant manifestation of a growing movement of resistance
to the attempt by Europe’s governments and corporations to
make workers pay for the economic crisis and the multibillion-euro
bailout of the banks.
At the very onset of this new movement of the working class, two
fundamental characteristics have emerged: the movement assumes a
cross-border and international character, and the workers immediately
come up against the bankruptcy of their old trade union and political
organizations—all of which are wedded to a nationalist program.
Indeed, austerity measures are being imposed by governments of the
official “left” no less than those of the “centre”
and “right.”
This week saw a succession of strikes and protests throughout Europe:
On Monday, Lufthansa’s 4,500 pilots in Germany struck. In
France, air traffic controllers struck alongside workers at six
French oil refineries. British Airways cabin crew voted by over
80 percent to strike.
On Tuesday, protest rallies took place in Madrid, Barcelona and
Valencia against the austerity measures of the Spanish Socialist
Workers Party (PSOE) government of José Zapatero. Trade unions
in the Czech Republic announced that public transport would be halted
next week.
A one-day general strike of the public sector is planned for March
4 in Portugal over the extension of a wage freeze as part of measures
to cut the deficit from 9.3 percent of gross domestic product to
3 percent by 2013. French pilots have also announced plans to strike
later this week.
READ
FULL STORY
Share
This Article With A Friend
Click on the icon below to email this article to a friend,
or share it on the social network of your choice.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
Global Sweatshop
Wage Slavery
Posted: 2010/02/25
From: Mathaba
Global trade rules don`t protect the poor. They struggle to keep
jobs they know will harm or kill them because of no choice...
by Stephen Lendman
|
In its mission statement, the National Labor Committee (NLC)
highlights the problem stating:
"Transnational corporations (TNCs) now roam the world to find
the cheapest and most vulnerable workers." They're mostly young
women in poor countries like China, India, Bangladesh, Vietnam,
Indonesia, Nicaragua, Haiti, and many others working up to 14 or
more hours a day for sub-poverty wages under horrific conditions.
Because TNCs are unaccountable, a dehumanized global workforce
is ruthlessly exploited, denied their civil liberties, a living
wage, and the right to work in dignity in healthy safe environments.
NLC conducts "popular campaigns based on (its) original research
to promote worker rights and pressure companies to end human and
labor abuses. (It) views worker rights in the global economy as
indivisible and inalienable human rights and (believes) now is the
time to secure them for all on the planet." READ
FULL STORY
|
Share
This Article With A Friend
Click on the icon below to email this article to a friend,
or share it on the social network of your choice.
|
|
|
|
| 
|
Blackwater Wants
to Surge its Armed Force in Afghanistan
A newly released State Department audit of Blackwater praises the
firm’s work as the US government weighs expanding Blackwater’s
operations in Afghanistan.
By Jeremy
Scahill
|
A just-released US State Department
Inspector General’s report [PDF] on Blackwater’s work
in Afghanistan reveals that Blackwater is proposing increasing its
private armed forces in Afghanistan, particularly in Mazar-e-Sharif
and Herat where the US is opening consulates. Blackwater is currently
in the running for a $1 billion contract to train Afghanistan’s
national police force.
In general, the report praises Blackwater’s work in protecting
US diplomats and aid officials, saying its “personal protective
services have been effective in ensuring the safety of chief of
mission personnel in Afghanistan’s volatile and ever-changing
security environment.” The Inspector General, however, criticized
Blackwater for providing “inappropriate” training for
its Afghanistan personnel pre-deployment, saying “before arriving
in the country, personal security specialists did not receive a
speci?c type of security training unique to operating in the Afghanistan
environment,” saying that “rather than taking courses
in cultural awareness for Afghanistan, the specialists had been
trained in Iraq cultural awareness.”
The IG’s report, which was completed in August, makes no
mention of the May 2009 incident where Blackwater operatives allegedly
killed two Afghan civilians sparking their arrest in the US on murder
charges. That could be because those men worked on a Department
of Defense training contract (not a State Department diplomatic
security contract) for Blackwater subsidiary Paravant. Blackwater
works for multiple federal agencies in Afghanistan. The IG’s
report focuses on the work of Blackwater’s recently renamed
US Training Center (USTC). “No one under U.S. Training Center’s
protection has been injured or killed, and there have been no incidents
involving the use of deadly force,” according to the report.
The report was released before the December 30 suicide bombing of
the CIA station in Khost, Afghanistan where at least two Blackwater
operatives were killed while reportedly doing security for the CIA.
READ
FULL STORY |
Share
This Article With A Friend
Click on the icon below to email this article to a friend,
or share it on the social network of your choice.
|
|
|
|
Time
Magazine Pushes Draconian Internet Licensing Plan
Establishment mouthpiece calls for web ID system that would outstrip
Communist Chinese style net censorship
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison
Planet.com
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Time Magazine has enthusiastically jumped on the bandwagon to back
Microsoft executive Craig Mundie’s call for Internet licensing,
as authorities push for a system even more stifling than in Communist
China, where only people with government permission would be allowed
to express free speech.
As we reported earlier this week, during a recent conference at
the Davos Economic Forum, Craig Mundie, chief research and strategy
officer for Microsoft, told fellow globalists at the summit that
the Internet needed to be policed by means of introducing licenses
similar to drivers licenses – in other words government permission
to use the web.
His proposal was almost instantly advocated by Time Magazine, who
published an article by Barbara Kiviat - one of Mundie’s fellow
attendees at the elitist confab. It’s sadistically ironic
that Kiviat’s columns run under the moniker “The Curious
Capitalist,” since the ideas expressed in her piece go further
than even the free-speech hating Communist Chinese have dared venture
in terms of Internet censorship.
“Now, there are, of course, a number of obstacles to making
such a scheme be reality,” writes Kiviat. “Even here
in the mountains of Switzerland I can hear the worldwide scream
go up: “But we’re entitled to anonymity on the Internet!”
Really? Are you? Why do you think that?”
Kiviat ludicrously compares the necessity to show identification
when entering a bank vault to the apparent need for authorities
to know who you are when you set up a website to take credit card
payments. READ
FULL STORY
Share
This Article With A Friend
Click on the icon below to email this article to a friend,
or share it on the social network of your choice.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
Afghan Resistance
against US Invaders
US surge goes full steam ahead in Marjah
by Eric Walberg
Global
Research, February 24, 2010
Apart for Abu Ghraib, Fallujah is perhaps the Iraq war’s
defining moment. The hatred and resentment of the occupied people
found a catalyst in the four Blackwater mercenaries, who were killed
and strung up, and no doubt deserved their fate, certainly as symbols
of a cynical, illegal invasion. The US soldiers -- who are just
as mercenary, being a professional army invading a country sans
provocation -- came and "destroyed the village to save it." |
The "success" of the blitzkrieg
war in Iraq has been difficult to duplicate in Afghanistan, "the
heart of darkness", one British commander quipped to his troops
as they went into battle, despite dropping far more bombs -- many
of them radioactive. The unflagging resistance of the Afghans, their
refusal to submit to the occupiers, is that because they realise
the invaders are not there for their purported altruistic motives.
The thousands of civilians and resistance fighters who have been
killed by airstrikes -- none of them guilty of anything more egregious
than defending their homeland -- is more than ample proof, as is
the craven propping up of a US-imposed government, and the proliferation
of US bases in the country. The unapologetically un-Islamic ways
of the invaders, their lack of even the remotest understanding of
the people they are occupying, is a constant insult to a proud and
ancient people.
The new exit plan, so it goes, involves "clearing" all
regions of Taliban -- US Marines call it "mowing the grass",
acknowledging that as soon as they murder one group of resisters
and leave, more pop up. The "new" strategy is to bring
in ready-made Afghan administrators and police to create a prosperous,
peaceful society once the "enemy" have been destroyed,
"winning the hearts and minds" of the locals. "We’ve
got a government in a box, ready to roll in," said chief honcho
General Stanley McChrystal. READ
FULL STORY
|
Share
This Article With A Friend
Click on the icon below to email this article to a friend,
or share it on the social network of your choice.
|
|
|
|
|
|